Skip to main content

Is Adequate Nutrition Cost-Effective?

May 2018 Vol 11, No 3 - Editorial
David B. Nash, MD, MBA
Editor-in-Chief, American Health & Drug Benefits Founding Dean, Jefferson College of Population Health, Philadelphia, PA
Download PDF

As far as we know, Hippocrates was the first to formally recognize nutrition as an absolute therapeutic necessity. He is credited with memorable, and still remarkably relevant, quotes such as, “Let food be thy medicine and medicine be thy food,” and “Leave your drugs in the chemist’s pot if you can heal the patient with food.”

More than 2 millenia later, the goal of healthcare—getting the right therapy to the right patient at the right time—hasn’t changed all that much; however, our collective approach to incorporating new technologies in the treatment armamentarium must evolve. The following anecdote is a real-world example of what is happening in “niche” technology development across our industry.

An Age-Old Health Issue

I’ll begin with the very basic premise that adequate nutrition is vital to physiologic functioning and psychological well-being. For patients with a broad range of medical conditions, inadequate nutrition and/or ineffective nutritional support further compromise their health status and increase the cost of their care.

The term “malnutrition” may call to mind images of children and adults living in underdeveloped and developing countries. It may come as a surprise to many Americans, but physicians regularly diagnose and treat patients with malnutrition in intensive care units (ICUs) and in skilled nursing facilities across the United States. For the most medically advanced country in the world, this is unacceptable, even on a relatively small scale.

Target Populations

A variety of conditions are associated with digestive deficiency or malabsorption, such as patients who rely on tube feeding for nutrition, patients in ICUs, and infants in neonatal ICUs.

As a result of a lack of adequate pancreatic digestive enzymes, patients with exocrine pancreatic insufficiency have clinical symptoms related to malabsorption of fat. Exocrine pancreatic insufficiency is associated with diseases and conditions that affect the pancreas, including hereditary conditions (eg, cystic fibrosis) or acquired conditions (eg, chronic pancreatitis). For many of these patients, enteral nutrition is necessary to avoid malnourishment.1 Particularly in patients with cystic fibrosis, good nutritional status has been associated with improved clinical outcomes.2

Limited Therapeutic Options

None of the current US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved pancreatic enzyme replacement therapies (PERTs) are indicated for use in patients who receive enteral nutrition for several reasons. PERT capsules are intended for oral use; when crushed and added to enteral nutrition feedings, they have been shown to clog the tubes. In addition, the capsules are not indicated for overnight enteral nutrition, because their activity peaks at 30 minutes and wanes thereafter. Most impor­tant, even when administered in large doses, PERT capsules do not resolve the issue of incomplete hydrolysis of fats from enteral nutrition. Many patients with exocrine pancreatic insufficiency who use PERT capsules continue to struggle nutritionally and have clinical symptoms related to fat malabsorption.

Innovative Solution

A new hybrid technology was developed to address the treatment gap for the population of patients with conditions associated with digestive deficiency and malabsorption, in particular for patients who rely on tube feeding for nutrition, patients with acute pancreatitis and/or pancreatic cancer, children with cystic fibrosis, patients in ICUs, and infants in neonatal ICUs.

Immobilized lipase (Relizorb) is a novel in-line digestive cartridge designed specifically for hydrolyzing fats in enteral formulas.3 Administered without the risk for clogging feeding tubes, this technology has been shown to break down more than 90% of fats in enteral nutrition formulas throughout feedings.3

This hybrid technology was cleared by the FDA in December 2015 after a lengthy approval process. There is growing real-world clinical evidence of tolerability and improved fatty acid absorption, including weight gain and increased patient adherence to oral nutrition in patients with cystic fibrosis.4 Specifically, cystic fibrosis centers that use this technology to treat patients with cystic fibrosis who are receiving enteral nutrition have documented weight gain and increased basal metabolic rate. The patients included in short- and long-term studies of the technology at these centers represent roughly 2% of the approximately 3600 patients with cystic fibrosis who are being fed via a feeding tube.5-8

The Value Question

I’ve heard it said that technology generates value only if the health benefit outweighs the cost. Herein lies the next hurdle—getting a firm grasp on costs. In the example of this new treatment, the direct costs associated with enteral nutrition can range from $80 to $200 daily, considering the cost of the formula, tube-feeding supplies, and oral pancreatic enzymes (ie, PERT). Despite its significant expense, patients with cystic fibrosis who receive enteral nutrition achieve only 60% of normal fat levels, even after years of treatment.4 As in patients with other conditions related to exocrine pancreatic insufficiency, hospitalization becomes necessary when malabsorption results in malnutrition. The in-hospital costs of enteral nutrition include the time spent by medical professionals crushing and adding PERTs to feeding bags and addressing unresolved symptoms in patients.

Clearly, the potential benefits of innovative therapies for their target populations are substantial, and can be life-changing for some people. But how do we weigh cost versus health benefits when the target population is extremely rare? In the United States, for example, only approximately 11% of patients with cystic fibrosis (approximately 3300 individuals) required supplemental enteral nutrition in 2014.9 Similar to many innovative treatments, this new technology does not fit the typical payer reimbursement model.

Payer Implications

Payers consistently reimburse providers for standard therapies, even those that often fail to achieve the intended goal, such as traditional enteral nutrition regimens. In this case, the use of a new technology may optimize enteral nutrition, enable patients to achieve nutritional goals, reduce or eliminate the need for PERT during tube feeding, and ultimately reduce the avoidable costs associated with frequent hospitalizations and increased length of stay.

My takeaway message is that targeted innovative therapy is the new reality, one that has unimaginable promise for subpopulations of patients who struggle with relatively rare conditions. All stakeholders must accept responsibility for cutting through the politics to clear the pathway and get the right therapies or new technologies to the right people at the earliest opportunity.

Disclosure Statement
The general concepts and questions addressed in this editorial come across my desk with growing frequency. The issues are complex and a resolution will require multistakeholder input. To that end, we are working with the developers of this new technology to convene a national advisory panel.

David B. Nash, MD, MBA is Editor-in-Chief, American Health & Drug Benefits; Founding Dean, Jefferson College of Population Health, Philadelphia, PA

1. Schwarzenberg SJ, Hempstead SE, McDonald CM, et al. Enteral tube feeding for individuals with cystic fibrosis: Cystic Fibrosis Foundation evidence-­informed guidelines. J Cyst Fibros. 2016;15:724-735.
2. Shoff SM, Tluczek A, Laxova A, et al. Nutritional status is associated with health-related quality of life in children with cystic fibrosis aged 9-19 years. J Cyst Fibros. 2013;12:746-753.
3. Relizorb (immobilized lipase) cartridge [product instructions]. Newton, MA: Alcresta Therapeutics; January 2018.
4. Freedman S, Orenstein D, Black P, et al. Increased fat absorption from enteral formula through an in-line digestive cartridge in patients with cystic fibrosis. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2017;65:97-101.
5. Stevens JC, Wyatt C, Brown P, et al. Long-term use of Relizorb by children and adults with CF receiving enteral feeding increases ω-3 fatty acid levels and improves nutritional parameters. Abstract presented at the 2017 North American Cystic Fibrosis Conference. Indianapolis, IN: November 2-4, 2017. Abstract 606.
6. Iwanicki C, Bouma S, Nasr S. Use of immobilized lipase cartridge with overnight enteral feeds improves symptoms and results in weight gain in children with cystic fibrosis. Abstract presented at the 2017 North American Cystic Fibrosis Conference. Indianapolis, IN: November 2-4, 2017. Abstract 612.
7. Minor M, Nemastil CK, Gemma S, et al. Digestive enzyme cartridge (Relizorb) during continuous enteral feeds among individuals with cystic fibrosis. Abstract presented at the 2017 North American Cystic Fibrosis Conference. Indianapolis, IN: November 2-4, 2017. Abstract 628.
8. Hendrix S, Flume P, Michel S, et al. Use of an in-line digestive enzyme cartridge in pediatric patients. Abstract presented at the 2017 North American Cystic Fibrosis Conference. Indianapolis, IN: November 2-4, 2017. Abstract 634.
9. Cystic Fibrosis Foundation. Patient Registry: 2014 Annual Data Report. Accessed April 27, 2018.

Related Items
Convergence: Up Close and Personal
David B. Nash, MD, MBA
September 2022 Vol 15, No 3 published on September 27, 2022 in Editorial
A Sylvatic or Syncretic Approach to Healthcare Innovation?
David B. Nash, MD, MBA
June 2022 Vol 15, No 2 published on June 23, 2022 in Editorial
A Hollywood-Style Teachable Moment
David B. Nash, MD, MBA
March 2022 Vol 15, No 1 - Online Only published on March 23, 2022 in Editorial
A Pandemic Literary Genre
David B. Nash, MD, MBA
December 2021 Vol 14, No 4 published on December 29, 2021 in Editorial
Post-Pandemic Physician Leadership
David B. Nash, MD, MBA
September 2021 Vol 14, No 3 published on September 14, 2021 in Editorial
Last modified: August 30, 2021