Skip to main content

Selective, Small-Molecule DRD2 Antagonist Induces Tumor Regression in Recurrent High-Grade Glioma

August 2019, Vol 12, Special Issue: Payers' Perspectives In Oncology: ASCO 2019 Highlights - Emerging Therapies

Chicago, IL—ONC201, a small-molecule DRD2 antagonist, results in durable tumor regression in adults with recurrent high-grade H3-K27M gliomas, reported lead investigator Isabel Arrillaga-Romany, MD, PhD, Associate Clinical Director, Neuro-Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, at ASCO 2019.

Data from 29 adults who received treatment with single-agent oral ONC201 as of January 20, 2019, showed an objective response rate (ORR) of 27% in contrast-enhancing disease, 36% ORR in non–contrast-enhancing disease, and 47% ORR in contrast-enhancing or non–contrast-enhancing disease.

These response rates are “exceedingly rare in this tumor type, with really no responses being reported in the literature in the recurrent setting,” said Dr Arrillaga-Romany. There are no therapies for recurrent high-grade gliomas that can improve survival.

“There exists a subgroup of highly aggressive, high-grade gliomas that are characterized by their midline location in addition to their unique molecular signature, and that is a mutation in the histone 3 [H3] protein at position 27,” said Dr Arrillaga-Romany. These tumors are most frequently found in pediatric populations, but also occur in adults, and they are invariably lethal.

ONC201 is a DRD2 antagonist and ClpP agonist that induced tumor-cell apoptosis. ONC201 may work selectively in H3-K27M mutation–positive gliomas because of its associated dopamine receptor deregulation. “We have shown in other gliomas that there is a signature associated with increased sensitivity to ONC201, and that is elevated DRD2 expression and low DRD5 expression, and that is exactly what we see in the H3-K27M mutations,” she said.

Durable Response in Phase 2 Studies

A total of 27 patients (median age, 35 years) received treatment with oral ONC201 as part of 2 ongoing phase 2 clinical trials and 2 patients under the compassionate use protocol. ONC201 625 mg was administered weekly, except for 1 patient who was dosed once every 3 weeks.

In all, 52% of tumors were located in the thalamus and 21% in the brain stem; 48% of patients had multifocal disease. The median number of lesions per patient was 2. Overall, 90% of patients had received temozolomide (Temodar), and all patients had received radiation at a median of 8.5 months from its completion to the initiation of ONC201.

Of 29 patients, 11 continued to receive treatment with ONC201, with a median follow-up of 9 months. “Three of those patients have remained on therapy after progression due to investigator discretion, seeing that the patients have clinical benefit on therapy,” said Dr Arrillaga-Romany.

A total of 15 patients were evaluable for radiographic response; patients enrolled after December 2018 were excluded from the study to enable a minimum of a 6-month readout for efficacy. An ORR by blinded independent central review was observed in 4 (27%) of 15 contrast-enhancing lesions, with 1 complete response, 3 partial responses, and 7 best responses of stable disease.

The ORR of the patients with non–contrast-enhancing disease was 36%, with 1 complete response, 1 partial response, 3 minor responses, and 4 best responses of stable disease. In considering contrast-enhancing and non–contrast-enhancing disease, the ORR was 47% (7 of 15 patients).

In contrast-enhancing disease, the median onset of response was 2.6 months, and the median duration of response was not reached, with a median follow-up of 7.7 months. Some of the responses were associated with improvements in disease-associated neurologic symptoms.

At 6 months, 33% of patients were free of progression. The median overall survival was not reached, with a median follow-up of 7.5 months. Both studies are ongoing.

Related Items
Novel Target: RARA Agonist plus Azacitidine Active in Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Phoebe Starr
February 2021 Vol 14, Special Issue: Payers' Perspectives in Oncology published on February 24, 2021 in Emerging Therapies
Magrolimab, First CD47 Antibody, Shows Promise in Combination with Azacitidine in Unfit Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Wayne Kuznar
February 2021 Vol 14, Special Issue: Payers' Perspectives in Oncology published on February 24, 2021 in Emerging Therapies
Oral Vodobatinib Elicits Durable Responses in Heavily Pretreated Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia
Chase Doyle
February 2021 Vol 14, Special Issue: Payers' Perspectives in Oncology published on February 24, 2021 in Emerging Therapies
First-Line Mosunetuzumab Safe and Effective in Older Patients with Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma
Chase Doyle
February 2021 Vol 14, Special Issue: Payers' Perspectives in Oncology published on February 24, 2021 in Emerging Therapies
Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocyte Therapy Induces Responses Across Wide Range of Patients with Advanced Melanoma
Wayne Kuznar
August 2020 Vol 13, Special Issue: Payers' Perspectives in Oncology published on August 17, 2020 in Emerging Therapies
Last modified: August 30, 2021