Conference Correspondent

Comparing Healthcare Utilization of 2 Drug Regimens in Patients with CLL

Conference Correspondent - Conference Correspondent, ASH 2016 - Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

It is estimated that 18,960 new cases of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) were diagnosed in 2016, and 4660 deaths. This type of cancer is more often in older individuals (median age, 71 years) at diagnosis than in patients age <55 years (11%) in the United States. The median survival in patients with CLL ranges from 2 years to >10 years. The first-line standard of care for patients with CLL without deletion (del)17p is a combination chemotherapy with the regimen of fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab (FCR) or with the regimen of bendamustine plus rituximab (BR).

An analysis of administrative claims from the Truven Health MarketScan Research database was used to examine differences in healthcare utilization between 2 cohorts of newly diagnosed patients with CLL who received treatment either with BR or FCR. In addition, the investigators analyzed differences across age-groups.

A total of 1795 patients with newly diagnosed CLL were identified who received treatment with first-line BR (N = 946) or with FCR (N = 849). Patients in the BR cohort were significantly older, included more women, and more often had comorbidities compared with the patients who received treatment with the FCR regimen (P <.05 for all differences).

The patients who received the BR regimen had significantly fewer outpatient visits than the patients in the FCR cohort during the first 6 months of therapy, as well as during months 12 to 18 (14.05 vs 17.03, respectively); across all follow-up periods, the patients in the BR cohort were also less likely to have a visit to the emergency department or to be hospitalized (odds ratio [OR], 0.66; P <.05).

Some differences were especially clear between the 2 cohorts. The patients in the FCR cohort who were older (age ≥70 years), had, on average, more outpatient visits (OR for emergency department visit, 1.14), and a greater likelihood of an emergency department visit or a hospitalization stay (OR for hospitalization, 1.50) than the patients in the BR cohort.

Overall, these results suggest that the healthcare utilization among patients with CLL who continue to use the BR regimen is significantly lower than the healthcare utilization of patients who use the FCR regimen long-term. Furthermore, patients aged ≥70 years who received treatment with the FCR regimen had significantly more hospitalizations, outpatient visits, and visits to the emergency department than those who received treatment with the BR regimen.

These results support the use of BR as an effective and safe chemoimmunotherapy option for elderly patients with CLL in the era of novel agents and immunotherapies.

Related Items
Evaluation of Minimal Residual Disease in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Patients Treated with a Daratumumab-Based Regimen
Conference Correspondent published on December 2, 2016 in Conference Correspondent, ASH 2016 - Multiple Myeloma
Meta-Analysis to Compare Efficacy of Treatment Regimens for Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Patients
Conference Correspondent published on December 2, 2016 in Conference Correspondent, ASH 2016 - Multiple Myeloma
Phase II Study of Lenalidomide, Subcutaneous Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone (RsqVD) in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma
Conference Correspondent published on December 2, 2016 in Conference Correspondent, ASH 2016 - Multiple Myeloma
Budget Impact Analysis of Elotuzumab in Combination with Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone for Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma
Conference Correspondent published on December 2, 2016 in Conference Correspondent, ASH 2016 - Multiple Myeloma
A New Risk Stratification Tool to Estimate Survival in Patients with Multiple Myeloma After First Relapse
Conference Correspondent published on December 2, 2016 in Conference Correspondent, ASH 2016 - Multiple Myeloma
Last modified: May 17, 2017
  •  Association for Value-Based Cancer Care
  • Value-Based Cancer Care
  • Value-Based Care in Rheumatology
  • Oncology Practice Management
  • Rheumatology Practice Management
  • Urology Practice Management
  • Inside Patient Care: Pharmacy & Clinic
  • National Association of Specialty Pharmacy
  • Lynx CME